Tag Archive: contraception

Homily for Mass – Notre Dame Cathedral Basilica, Ottawa

Sunday, 7 October 2012 – 7.30pm

(Readings: Gen 2:7, 15, 18-24;  Ps 128;  Heb 2:9-11;  Mk 10:2-16]

As we hear in the Book of Genesis, God did not create us to be alone, or to live in isolation.  The Lord says, “It is not good for the man to be alone.”  Rather, God created us to be in relationship with others.  Our lives are a complex web of relationships of all different types.  We can think of the relationship between parents and their children, between our brothers and sisters in our families, and all the other relationships in our families.  We have friends, acquaintances, work colleagues;  people we live in the same house with;  we have the relationship of fellow believers, people we know in the Church.

 But, amongst all the relationships of life, the union of a man and a woman in marriage, as a partnership for the whole of life, has been held up, from time immemorial, as a pivotal relationship amongst all the others.  Scripture tells us that it was this way “in the beginning.”  This is the way God created it.  The creation of the partnership of man and woman is part of the final act of God’s creation.

 As the scriptural account goes, we know that the original sin disturbed what God created to be.  Once man did what God ordered not to be done, a rupture came into the original beauty of creation.  One of the first things disturbed by the original sin is that the original harmony of the relationship between man and woman is disrupted.  Adam blames his wife for his wrongdoing.  Competition creeps in.  The husband will “lord it over” his wife.  The disruption of the original harmony is such that Moses gives a law that allows divorce.  Moses can’t heal the disruption, and so he does the only thing he can do, he makes a provision to deal with the disruption to married life.

 In the first half of today’s gospel Jesus speaks of divorce and adultery in such a way as to reinforce that the original plan – the original beauty – of the one-flesh union of man and woman – was that it was something that was permanent, exclusive, and something that should not be put asunder.  Further, sexual relations with anyone other than one’s wife or husband were not part of the original beauty and order of creation.

 In the second half of today’s Gospel we hear about the disciples stopping the children coming to Jesus.  At first glance it can seem that the two parts of the Gospel are not really related.  However, in Jesus’ admonition to the disciples to let the children come to him, and his further statement that his followers need to welcome the kingdom of God in the manner of a little child, Jesus indicates that his disciples need a conversion.  We could therefore say that in order to accept Jesus’ teaching on marriage and divorce we too need a conversion of heart (Terrence Prendergast, Living God’s Word: Reflections on the Sunday Readings for Year B, Toronto, Novalis, p. 144).  His teaching is not easy to live, and for many people, not easy even to accept.  It requires grace.

 On another level again, the second half of the Gospel is very closely tied with the first part.  The acceptance of children within marriage is a very real issue, because it would seem that part of the disruption of God’s creation as it concerns marriage is the non-acceptance of children.  This is evidenced through contraception and abortion.  Neither of these reflects the beauty and order of how God created things to be.

 We could obviously speak at length about all of those things: marriage, divorce, adultery, contraception and abortion.  But for the purposes of this homily, the thought I want to leave you with is this:  that “from the beginning of creation” God created a beautiful order to human relationships.  And of all those relationships, the one-flesh union of a man and woman – what we call marriage – was part of God’s plan.  Marriage was for the fulfillment of humankind, coming out of God’s concern that it was “not good that the man should be alone.”

 Human sin, though, has disrupted the relationships that God intended.   Sin has spoilt the beauty of the order that originally marked God’s creation.  Certain things have come about because of the disruption – and have come to be tolerated, just as Moses was forced to tolerate divorce – but these things are not what God intended, and they are not paths to life.

 Jesus Christ came to bring about a new creation.  He came to restore what God intended – to bring people back to the path that God wants us to walk.  Jesus’ work continues in and through the Church: and this is why the Church upholds the dignity of marriage.  This is why the Church teaches that contraception is against God’s plan, and that abortion is wrong.

Jesus is still working to bring about the new creation, to help people embrace the divine plan: which includes the divine vision for marriage and human sexuality.

 We know, too, that Jesus is our healer and our reconciler.  We all fall short of the divine plan in our own ways.  To say that the divine order has been disrupted, and that its beauty has been spoilt, these are not just abstract terms.  We bear those wounds in ourselves, in our very bodies.  We are wounded by divorce, by adultery, by contraception and by abortion.  To the extent that that is true, Jesus wants to heal us.  He wants to bring about our conversion so that we can come more and more closer to living the divine plan.  This is not simple.  But Jesus wants to forgive and heal us for when we have failed;  and in the faltering steps we take to live God’s will, Jesus gives us strength and grace and continually wills to lift us when we fall.  This he does most especially through the Sacrament of Penance.  But also – continually – through the Eucharist.

 May the Lord open our minds and hearts to be able to see the beauty of his divine plan for human life.  And may we, through our worship tonight, reach out for the Lord as he reaches out to us, to bring us into his kingdom.

A story today on LifeSiteNews:

Student union at Ottawa’s Catholic university still handing out condoms

I have commented on this issue previously here.

Please pray for our University, that all of us here may be more deeply converted to Christ in his Church.

Our Saint Paul Students for Life group recently hosted an event: Natural Women’s Health and Fertility, which touched on many aspects of natural family planning.

A story about the event can be found here.

The photos that I took on the night can be found here.

I haven’t blogged on this topic up until now, as usually it’s better if “internal” matters can be resolved internally if at all possible, without bringing in the whole world.  However, during this past week CBC News Ottawa carried the story, Catholic University in Ottawa opposes free condoms.  This is not a new story.  Last year it came to our attention that condoms were being handed out to students of our university by the student association (SPUSA – Saint Paul University Student Association; SPUSA on Facebook).

Many of us felt that this was totally inappropriate to be happening in a Catholic university, and so made representation to the university administration to take appropriate action.  We particularly asked the university administration to be faithful to the fact that Saint Paul University is a Catholic institution.

The story came to light in the media this week probably due to an online petition that was created by a “Concerned Student” – St Paul University’s condom ban is unacceptable!  As the petition front-page says, SPUSA was to enter into talks with the university administration this past week in order to reach a resolution on this issue.  At this stage, we wait to hear the outcome of these discussions.

But, to continue the thought I began in the title of this post, I offer the following as the beginning of some reasons why I oppose the handing out of condoms at a Catholic university.

I believe that, as a Catholic, I rightly expect that I won’t find things that are opposed to the Catholic faith happening on Catholic property.  Not only in classrooms, in terms of what is taught, but the whole atmosphere of an institution that belongs to the Church should faithfully express what the Church believes.  I don’t believe that people have a right to do things that are offensive to the Catholic faith on Catholic property.

As some have pointed out, in one sense trying to block the handing out of condoms is a futile exercise.  People can get contraception everywhere.  But that is part of my argument too!  If they can get it anywhere and everywhere, they certainly don’t need to get it at a Catholic institution.

One thing I find offensive about allowing condoms to be handed out is that it ignores the fact that the Church has a positive and life-affirming vision of sexuality.  It is a challenging vision, and it certainly does not include contraception.  Many people may disagree with the Church’s vision, and many want to pretend that the Church doesn’t teach such things any more.  But we do, and to act otherwise is a lie.  Handing out condoms – and allowing this to happen – ignores the Church’s vision of sexuality and effectively condones immoral behaviour.  It suggests that the students are incapable of controlling themselves.  Instead of challenging students and offering the richer teaching of Christ which involves self-control and chastity, we are giving in to the ways of the world.  Handing out condoms, and allowing this practice, is an epic failure in Christian leadership, in my opinion.  This is why I have spoken up about this issue.  We can, and should, be doing much more for the formation of the young people who are in our Catholic institutions.  Not to offer them the fullness of what we believe – whether they accept it or not – is a failure on our part.  They can receive the teachings of the secular world anywhere else, but we have something different, something better, to offer: the way of life given us by Christ and handed on in his Church.

By coincidence, this blog post alerted me to this excellent lecture by Fr James Dominic Brent, OP: Catholic University of America Professor on Contraception: “To Be Someone Radiant.”

It is well worth the read, and it expresses excellently why I oppose the handing out of condoms at a Catholic university.

Please pray for our university and all of us here!

UPDATE 18 MARCH 2012A story in the Ottawa Citizen, Saint Paul University, students clash over condoms: School wants student association to stop distributing the contraceptives presents some new information and refers to a joint press release issued by SPUSA and Saint Paul University.

That statement can be found here: http://ustpaul.ca/en/jointpressreleasefromsaintpauluniversityandsaintpauluniversitysstudentassociation_1058_17.htm or here (if the link doesn’t work): Joint Press Release from Saint Paul University and Saint Paul University’s Student Association

It is certainly my hope that the leaders of Saint Paul University, who act in the name of the Church, will truly do that, and will work to see that the truth of the Catholic faith is shared with all who come to our University.


One opportunity presented by the current ruckus in the US between the bishops and the president is for the Church to restate its teaching on contraception.  Some people probably roll their eyes at that suggestion, “here we go again,” they say.  Well, yes!  The truth may not be fashionable, but the truth it remains.  Many suggest that what Pope Paul VI predicted in Humanae vitae has in fact come true.  The truth is that a non-contraceptive mentality is more life-giving, more healthy, ultimately a more human way of life.  This is the truth that the Church has been given to share.

A few supplementary points: contraceptives are morally wrong whether they are abortifacient or not.   Secondly, a young man asking if it is wrong to use contraception when having sex with his girlfriend is asking the wrong question: sex with anyone other than one’s husband or wife is wrong.

For more, see:  Catholic Teaching on Contraception: For Married Couples Only?  Condemnation of Contraception is a Universal Norm (ZENIT).